When we decided it was a good time to try to get pregnant the first time, I was 29 and the thought of long term family planning (‘how many, when, what spacing’) seemed like questions far too optimistic for two women who had not yet been pregnant. Who knew if our first attempts would work? And I always knew I wanted two kids if possible, so it wasn’t really on my radar that I might be about to turn 34, happily caring for two strong-willed, funny, capable, strong, smart, and energetic children and asking these very questions. I never really considered that I would become one of those people who thinks about timing children in relation to what my body might be capable of doing. But here I am, to spite myself. 

I should probably start with this: we don’t know if we’ll try to grow our family more. Many of my readers know first or second hand that even if we choose to try, it might not happen, with no connection to age. I have a whole list of blog topics that I’ve been thinking about surrounding growing our family, including but not limited to: Are we ridiculous to think about more children while I’m working full time, my wife is in her PhD program, and we already have two small children who are eating us one nibble at a time? Is the stress of ttc really worth it with two little ones?My mother and the guilt of increasing her carbon footprint. The effect on our sweet toddler who is already jealous of the sister who doesn’t get to nurse with me. The effect on the little peanut who has recently discovered ‘mamama’ can also mean ‘mine!’ Will it matter when the Cascadia fault brings down the entire west side of Oregon? Climate change. Evil orange 45 and trying to pay for Healthcare. Nuclear holocaust. Basically in that order. 

But today, I’m thinking about my ability to have kids, and my body and mind as I get older. We don’t want to have large age gaps between kids. 22 months is nice. They are old enough now that they have started playing together. They are also old enough now that we had started trying for Linnea when Darwin was Linnea’s age. I wish we were ready now, but yeah no. So the question becomes, when would we be ready? Will the choice be made for us by simply…timing out? Darwin still doesn’t sleep through the night (well, sometimes by the 5 hours definition of it, but that’s some next label bullshit right there). If and when she starts, could I really see starting over with a nurseling? If my mother’s experience is to be expanded to my own offspring, I would need to get pregnant before Darwin turns 4. That seems like a reasonable goal. A year from now I could see possibly being in a good position to try. 

I would be 35. ‘Geriatric’ under the ob definition of pregnancy. My midwife wouldn’t label anything so poorly. If it was another low risk pregnancy I could certainly plan another homebirth. This also pushes back the possibility of a fourth, Leah would be 36 or 37 before we would be ready again. So that complicates things. I wish I could say ‘one thing at a time’ but with us it is really two. Three if you count Leah’s dissertation. Because that’s it’s own baby. 

Are we totally crazy to even be thinking about this? Probably. But the world needs more gaybies. Someone has to do it, right? 


12 thoughts on “Clocks

  1. I easily conceived and had Ali at 35, it wasn’t that difficult, but I have zero interest in a home birth or midwives, so all that stuff never came up for me.
    Our happy medium between wanting more kids, feeling too old to be pregnant, and feeling guilty about overpopulation is foster to adopt. I highly recommend it!


    • Oh yeah, access to the care I want isn’t really a question, since our midwife isn’t fussed by age. We’ve talked about fostering when the kids are older, definitely on the table, though I don’t think we’d go into it with adoption as the goal. We have a need in our area for long term and short term non permanent placements.


  2. I don’t think you’re crazy at all. I started doing the calculations for timing #3 before #1 was even born! And I’ll be 37 (most likely) when we have #3, IF we have #3. I feel it in my soul that I want to, need to. My wife is MUCH less convinced. We’re still waiting for the positive HPT on #2 (although if this round worked, they’ll be 21 months apart, which feels great).

    I laughed hard at this, because I always thought about that while we lived in Oregon too! “Will it matter when the Cascadia fault brings down the entire west side of Oregon?”

    Liked by 3 people

  3. One of our factors was that timing ran out. If we were going to have a second we wanted them close. I set a goal for us to decide by the time Gus was 14 months. That time came and we weren’t convinced. All your arguments are good arguments both in the pro/con column!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. AndiePants says:

    I think about it! We are planning on three right now, with me carrying last. I’ll be almost 36 when Tiny is born (L will be almost 37) so we’ll both be headed to 40 before we conceive #3. Luckily, #3 would be from the IVF cycle when I was 32, making my chances of success on par with that age range. And… I also think about nuclear war, industrial collapse, etc. But it’s never a sure thing so… Babies!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Yeah. A year ago I was part of a sermon series at our UU fellowship by young parents, and one of the speakers said something that really resonated with me with regards to our long term outlook. “It’s not going to be ok, but it’s going to be ok.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s